(recherche) > Chercher à l'intérieur d'un site - Brainsfeed - Intelligence Stratégique et Veille

Chercher à l'intérieur d'un site http://bit.ly/cDbiyA Un #bookmarklet du #moteur_de_recherche #google est disponible #aaaliens | source : www.brainsfeed.com

Recommandé parrecriweb le 02/09/10 10:05 | permalien

Google's Book Search: A Disaster for Scholars - The Chronicle Review 08/2010

erreurs de dates, de classifications des ouvrages.. Avec le cas Google on peut mesurer que les ouvrages académiques sont un peu plus que de simples systèmes d'informations... | source : chronicle.com

Recommandé parelectropublication le 31/08/10 17:51 | permalien

Google ou la culture de l’erreur - Owni

Google Wave n'a pas marché... Tant pis. Le plantage fait partie de la culture Google ! | source : owni.fr

Recommandé parHubert Guillaud le 31/08/10 16:19 | permalien

danah boyd | apophenia » a few thoughts on name changes & reputation

I nearly bowled over laughing when I read that Eric Schmidt told the Wall Street Journal that he thought that name changes would become more common place. The WSJ states:

“[Schmidt] predicts, apparently seriously, that every young person one day will be entitled automatically to change his or her name on reaching adulthood in order to disown youthful hijinks stored on their friends’ social media sites.”

This is ludicrous on many accounts. First, it completely contradicts historical legal trajectories where name changes have become increasingly more difficult. Second, it fails to account for the tensions between positive and negative reputation. Third, it would be so exceedingly ineffective as to be just outright absurd. | source : www.zephoria.org

Recommandé parFrancis Pisani le 31/08/10 10:01 | permalien

Web isn’t dead, it’s the economy, stupid !

Parler d’abonnement, installation ou souscription en lieu et place de syndication n’est que de la sémantique. Du moment que c’est l’utilisateur qui prend la décision de s’approprier le service, peu importe la nature de cette appropriation. Les gens ne portent pas de valeur à la technologie. Ils s’en servent, elles les sert, et s’il y a mieux ou que ça ne marche pas autant qu’ils le souhaitent, ils en changent. Les geeks, c’est fini, place à des masses qui n’ont aucun mysticisme de la technologie. | source : www.groupereflect.net

Recommandé parpalpitt le 27/08/10 18:44 | permalien

Google Suggest Of The Day

A blog devoted to random suggestions by Google's Suggest feature: http://suggestoftheday.com/ | source : suggestoftheday.com

Recommandé parPaul Bradshaw le 26/08/10 20:05 | permalien

Voix sur IP dans Gmail : et si Google analysait toutes les conversations ? - Numerama

En lançant son service de téléphonie IP, Google propose un outil de plus pour mieux nous connaitre. Politique fiction ? | source : www.numerama.com

Recommandé parHubert Guillaud le 26/08/10 18:10 | permalien

Analyzing World Cup Data with YQL (Yahoo! Developer Network Blog)

One of the simplest ways to make a data set like this available to YQL is to host it on Google Docs and share it for the web as a CSV file. That way you can use the CSV table in YQL and name the columns to make them sortable and possible to query: | source : developer.yahoo.net

Recommandé parPaul Bradshaw le 24/08/10 09:50 | permalien

See What Google Knows About Your "Social Circle"

Google started including "your social circle" in its search results earlier this year. Ever wonder how Google knows who you know? Wonder no more, as the Mountain View firm offers a page explaining exactly how inter-connected your online life really is. | source : lifehacker.com

Recommandé parPhilippe Martin le 23/08/10 23:02 | permalien

Holman W. Jenkins Jr.: Google and the Search for the Future - WSJ.com

Says Mr. Schmidt, a generation of powerful handheld devices is just around the corner that will be adept at surprising you with information that you didn't know you wanted to know. "The thing that makes newspapers so fundamentally fascinating—that serendipity—can be calculated now. We can actually produce it electronically," Mr. Schmidt says.


Mr. Schmidt obviously has an eye to his audience, which this day consists of folks with an abiding devotion to the newspaper business. He assures us that in the coming deluge trusted "brands" will be more important than ever. Just as quickly, though, he adds that whether the winners will be new brands or existing brands remains to be seen. On one thing, however, Google is willing to bet: "The only way the problem [of insufficient revenue for news gathering] is going to be solved is by increasing monetization, and the only way I know of to increase monetization is through targeted ads. That's our business." | source : online.wsj.com

Recommandé parPaul Bradshaw le 23/08/10 10:39 | permalien